Crow vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,317,187 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.585% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 585.2 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $54,264, a difference of 71.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $119,756, a difference of 67.9%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $105,335, a difference of 65.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $57,931, a difference of 23.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $46,972, a difference of 33.2%), and wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 40.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 127.9%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 105.6%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 256.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 223.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 221.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 90.4%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 63.5%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 113.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.0%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 99.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.68%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 68.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%).