Chinese vs Aleut Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Aleut
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Aleuts
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Aleut Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,293,519 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.347% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 346.6 Aleuts.
Chinese vs Aleut Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,708, a difference of 23.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,446, a difference of 18.0%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $98,702, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,719, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $42,210, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Poor $42,210 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Poor $98,702 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Fair $83,446 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $44,241 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $51,168 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Poor $38,719 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,377 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Poor $91,370 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Average $100,052 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Excellent $62,708 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Chinese vs Aleut Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 57.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 55.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 26.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 12.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Poor 9.5% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Poor 11.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 20.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Fair 16.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Poor 12.4% |
Chinese vs Aleut Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 73.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 69.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 10.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.4% |
Chinese vs Aleut Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 81.0% |
Chinese vs Aleut Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 54.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Poor 45.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 39.3% |
Chinese vs Aleut Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 58.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 87.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Chinese vs Aleut Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Average 85.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 55.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 39.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 31.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chinese vs Aleut Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Aleut |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 28.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 50.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |