Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Inupiat
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Inupiat

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Inupiat Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,665,596 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Inupiat communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Inupiat corresponds to a decrease of 7.9 Immigrants from China.
Inupiat Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,999 compared to $54,264, a difference of 46.7%), median male earnings ($47,281 compared to $67,353, a difference of 42.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,619 compared to $119,756, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,935 compared to $57,931, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,061 compared to $69,174, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($40,080 compared to $46,972, a difference of 17.2%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,730
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,841
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,000
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,281
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,080
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,935
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,619
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,355
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,061
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.8%
Poor
26.7%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 109.7%), single male poverty (20.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 75.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 11.2%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.6%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Good
29.0%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
9.6%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (17.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 184.3%), male unemployment (12.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 131.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (13.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 114.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (7.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.3%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
10.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
8.2%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
22.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
28.1%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
9.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.1%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.0%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
83.2%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 163.4%), births to unmarried women (52.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 111.1%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.8%), average family size (3.63 compared to 3.23, a difference of 12.4%), and divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.8%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
Family Households
Exceptional
67.8%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
32.8%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.63
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.3%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
24.7%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 97.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (71.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (71.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 18.7%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.9%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
71.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.0%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 136.2%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 112.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 101.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.18%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and 10th grade (94.4% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
3.1%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 285.4%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 79.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (34.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.29%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricInupiatImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%