Chinese vs Serbian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,919,157 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Serbians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,087, a difference of 26.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,106, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,572, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,677, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,551, a difference of 0.98%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,975, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.52%), disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.7%).