Chinese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,838,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 50.8 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,643, a difference of 21.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,914, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $104,992, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,913, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,527, a difference of 0.16%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,352, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.3%).