Chinese vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,816,062 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.558% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 558.5 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,060, a difference of 46.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $82,287, a difference of 41.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $69,947, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.6%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $47,729, a difference of 19.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,270, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 79.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 79.8%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.6%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.9%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.1%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.7%).