Hopi vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,418,209 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.430% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to a decrease of 429.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,177 compared to $54,264, a difference of 74.1%), median family income ($77,188 compared to $125,540, a difference of 62.6%), and median household income ($65,043 compared to $105,335, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $57,931, a difference of 23.3%), wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $69,174, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (27.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 141.7%), receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 125.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 111.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 32.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 169.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (11.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 133.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (13.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 116.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (58.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (71.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 105.9%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 67.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and average family size (3.60 compared to 3.23, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 94.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.0%), and bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 91.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.34%), 9th grade (94.8% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and 11th grade (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 380.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 59.3%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.0%).