Chinese vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,534,146 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 13.3 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,902, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $107,775, a difference of 7.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $91,605, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $103,486, a difference of 0.75%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,275, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 40.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.6%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 54.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%).