Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,903,413 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.253% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 253.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,466 compared to $119,756, a difference of 28.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $122,178, a difference of 25.5%), and median male earnings ($53,715 compared to $67,353, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $46,972, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $69,174, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.94%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (60.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 42.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.0%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%).