Chinese vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,640,023 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,885, a difference of 21.3%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,627, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,209, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,554, a difference of 0.22%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,841, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $101,415, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 50.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.3%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 3.0%).