Chinese vs Argentinean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Argentinean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Argentineans
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Argentinean Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,985,164 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 32.1 Argentineans.
Chinese vs Argentinean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,246, a difference of 18.7%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,862, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,154, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $103,111, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,952, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $112,665, a difference of 3.1%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $112,665 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $93,960 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $50,399 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $60,117 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $41,952 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $54,154 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $103,111 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $110,103 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $65,246 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Chinese vs Argentinean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.5%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Chinese vs Argentinean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.3% |
Chinese vs Argentinean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 33.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chinese vs Argentinean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 0.87%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (68.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Chinese vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Poor 54.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Chinese vs Argentinean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Excellent 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 63.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 51.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chinese vs Argentinean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.5%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Argentinean |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |