Chinese vs Yuman Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,213,560 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 26.1 Yuman.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($116,188 compared to $78,055, a difference of 48.9%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,110, a difference of 45.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $68,743, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,933, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,377, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 167.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 158.2%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 155.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 48.3%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 53.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 56.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 293.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 139.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 133.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 39.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 86.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.47, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 80.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 68.7%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.8%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 67.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 53.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 11.7%).