Chinese vs Iraqi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Iraqi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Iraqis
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iraqi Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,233,285 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Iraqis within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.101% in Iraqis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 100.6 Iraqis.
Chinese vs Iraqi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,466, a difference of 28.1%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,753, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $99,387, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.8%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $54,182, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,140, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Fair $42,760 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Fair $100,658 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Fair $83,753 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Fair $46,140 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Average $54,182 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Poor $38,666 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,802 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Poor $90,764 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Fair $99,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Fair $60,466 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Poor 26.6% |
Chinese vs Iraqi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 60.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 17.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Poor 18.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Poor 17.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Fair 12.2% |
Chinese vs Iraqi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 67.7%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.5% |
Chinese vs Iraqi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chinese vs Iraqi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Average 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 27.6% |
Chinese vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 57.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Average 19.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Chinese vs Iraqi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.1%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 39.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Average 1.8% |
Chinese vs Iraqi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.64%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Iraqi |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |