Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Switzerland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Switzerland

Immigrants from China

Excellent
Good
8,358
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
75th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Switzerland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,619,364 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Switzerland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Switzerland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.087% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Switzerland corresponds to a decrease of 87.4 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Switzerland Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,185 compared to $119,756, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,528 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($97,979 compared to $105,335, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,343 compared to $69,174, a difference of 0.25%), per capita income ($54,866 compared to $54,264, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,866
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,726
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,979
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,211
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,944
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,996
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,528
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,185
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,934
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,343
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Poor
26.7%

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.4%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and poverty (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
10.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.29%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.2%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.8%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
61.6%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.7%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.7%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and bachelor's degree (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), college, 1 year or more (66.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.79%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.5%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.7%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.5%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.5%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Exceptional
3.1%

Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from SwitzerlandImmigrants from China
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%