Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from China
9,195
SOCIAL INDEX
89.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
28th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Sweden Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,442,406 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.203% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to a decrease of 203.1 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $119,756, a difference of 6.9%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $69,174, a difference of 0.79%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $125,540, a difference of 2.3%), and per capita income ($55,582 compared to $54,264, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $55,582 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $122,765 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $100,699 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,478 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,406 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,774 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,621 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $112,010 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $118,318 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,722 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.9% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.2% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.7%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 62.5% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 39.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 47.1%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.45%), college, 1 year or more (66.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.9% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |