Chinese vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,737,317 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 52.5 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,230, a difference of 24.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,769, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,336, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,858, a difference of 0.52%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,286, a difference of 0.73%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,911, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 64.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.1%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.6%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.2%).