Chinese vs Syrian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Syrian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Syrians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,975
SOCIAL INDEX
77.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
97th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Syrian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,098,611 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Syrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 24.9 Syrians.
Chinese vs Syrian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,494, a difference of 22.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,353, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $89,830, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,934, a difference of 0.20%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,837, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,727, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $46,837 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $109,299 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $89,830 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,934 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $58,187 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Excellent $40,727 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Poor $51,353 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $99,215 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $107,207 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $63,494 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.6% |
Chinese vs Syrian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.6%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 16.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Good 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Excellent 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 15.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Excellent 28.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 11.0% |
Chinese vs Syrian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 48.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.5% |
Chinese vs Syrian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Average 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 37.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Fair 82.6% |
Chinese vs Syrian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.25%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Excellent 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Chinese vs Syrian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Average 19.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Average 6.3% |
Chinese vs Syrian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 61.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 41.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chinese vs Syrian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Syrian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Excellent 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |