Chinese vs Polish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,745,025 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Poles within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.142% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 142.5 Poles.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,598, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,472, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,407, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,123, a difference of 0.050%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,659, a difference of 0.36%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $58,139, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 23.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 74.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.09, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Polish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.21%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%).