Chinese vs Colombian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,560,816 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colombians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Colombians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Colombians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,851, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $99,772, a difference of 16.4%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $100,750, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,439, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,349, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 57.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.97%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), family households (68.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 59.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.3%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.2%).