Chinese vs Honduran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,975,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hondurans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in Hondurans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 200.0 Hondurans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $52,634, a difference of 47.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $84,079, a difference of 38.2%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $85,004, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,013, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $48,885, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 96.2%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 90.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 41.5%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 56.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.34%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 45.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 108.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.42%).