Chinese vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,926,861 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Africans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.257% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 256.7 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,711, a difference of 44.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $84,925, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $72,650, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,530, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,955, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 83.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 82.0%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 18.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.1%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 35.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.4%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 51.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 49.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.28%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.1%).