Chinese vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,025,256 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 24.4 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,364, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $106,470, a difference of 9.1%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $90,907, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,273, a difference of 0.46%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,463, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $58,324, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 42.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.77%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 68.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 39.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%).