Immigrants from Netherlands vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,316,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Netherlands communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Netherlands within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Netherlands corresponds to an increase of 133.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,082 compared to $119,756, a difference of 14.0%), median female earnings ($41,870 compared to $46,972, a difference of 12.2%), and median household income ($94,411 compared to $105,335, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,463 compared to $69,174, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and per capita income ($50,458 compared to $54,264, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.42%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 61.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%).