Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,882,726 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.089% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 88.6 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,157, a difference of 26.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $98,467, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $84,299, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,644, a difference of 2.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,969, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,838, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 49.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 47.6%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.7%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%).