Chinese vs French American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
French American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
French American Indians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,780
SOCIAL INDEX
15.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
288th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
French American Indian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,073,801 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 43.4 French American Indians.
Chinese vs French American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,699, a difference of 41.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $89,811, a difference of 29.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $76,387, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,920, a difference of 12.3%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $50,611, a difference of 12.4%).
Income Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $40,244 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $92,872 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $76,387 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $43,333 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $50,611 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $36,920 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $48,977 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $85,899 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $89,811 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $54,699 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Good 25.4% |
Chinese vs French American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 62.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 59.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.2%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 34.5%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 18.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 24.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 33.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Chinese vs French American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chinese vs French American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.92%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 39.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 80.8% |
Chinese vs French American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 9.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 62.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 44.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 36.6% |
Chinese vs French American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.7%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Average 89.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chinese vs French American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Poor 90.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Fair 88.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 62.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 42.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 33.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chinese vs French American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.79%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | French American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 25.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |