Chinese vs Romanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,088,064 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.102% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 102.4 Romanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,142, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,632, a difference of 8.5%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,663, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $102,544, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $50,244, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.8%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.22%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.0%).