Chinese vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,229,213 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $67,234, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,705, a difference of 12.5%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,465, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $116,286, a difference of 0.080%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $105,748, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,508, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 27.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.87%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.3%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.9%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.6%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.84%).