Chinese vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,104,891 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.446. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.115% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 115.4 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 41.5%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,351, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,966, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,973, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,210, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,470, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 77.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 77.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 54.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.3%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.40, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 256.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 153.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 29.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 69.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 108.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 106.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.0%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.9%).