Chinese vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,834,969 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.255% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 254.9 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,888, a difference of 49.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $82,697, a difference of 40.5%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $83,618, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 10.2%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,647, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $48,267, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 101.5%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 94.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 92.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.8%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.47%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 43.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 115.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.40%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.57%).