Chinese vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,771,556 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of French within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 36.3 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,656, a difference of 29.8%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,468, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $99,824, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,350, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,296, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,685, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 73.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.8%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%).