Celtic vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from China
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,166,365 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.120% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 120.1 Immigrants from China.
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $119,756, a difference of 29.8%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $105,335, a difference of 26.6%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $54,264, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $69,174, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $57,931, a difference of 14.8%).
Income Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Poor 26.7% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 31.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.9%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 87.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Poor 6.0% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.7%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 73.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 47.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |