Chinese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,093,929 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.719. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.278% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 278.2 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,187, a difference of 22.6%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $101,061, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $101,170, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.27%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $53,661, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,933, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.9%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), family households (68.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.8%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.41%).