Chinese vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,480,974 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 30.0 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,201, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $108,234, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $108,270, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.33%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,136, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,040, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.35%), family households (68.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.65%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 107.0%), ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.77%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.8%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%).