Australian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,992,300 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 62.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $119,756, a difference of 11.0%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $105,335, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $46,972, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $69,174, a difference of 3.4%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $54,264, a difference of 4.2%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 50.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.4% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 0.71%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%).