Chinese vs Eastern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,549,764 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Eastern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 45.5 Eastern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $55,780, a difference of 21.0%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $66,472, a difference of 16.9%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $55,084, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($98,496 compared to $101,781, a difference of 3.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $120,684, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,066, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.81%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.12, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.53%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.8%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 41.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 59.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 8th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%).