Chinese vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,977,936 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.505% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 2,505.1 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $50,077, a difference of 54.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $87,580, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $75,848, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,614, a difference of 7.4%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $44,640, a difference of 9.4%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 115.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 84.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 93.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.7%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 71.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.6%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.17, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 101.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 89.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 59.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 110.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.9%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.4%).