Chinese vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,731,884 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.481% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 2,480.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $61,759, a difference of 8.6%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,894, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $72,288, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $117,750, a difference of 1.4%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $100,151, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $57,078, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.81%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.5%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.7%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.6%).