Chinese vs Seminole Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,415,935 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 Seminole.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $52,373, a difference of 47.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $80,077, a difference of 45.1%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $69,420, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,385, a difference of 20.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,233, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 83.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 81.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 41.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 42.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.82%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 54.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.9%).