Chinese vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,240,655 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.161% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 161.2 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $68,037, a difference of 13.9%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $52,391, a difference of 13.7%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $64,253, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($98,496 compared to $99,389, a difference of 0.91%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $117,814, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $121,202, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.2%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 52.0%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.8%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.2%).