Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Exceptional
Fair
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,061,940 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 44.7 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,331, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $100,523, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,425, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,929, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,941, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $50,151, a difference of 2.7%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income
Income MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Exceptional
$46,929
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Average
$103,197
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Good
$86,425
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Exceptional
$50,151
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Exceptional
$57,941
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Exceptional
$43,363
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Exceptional
$54,846
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Exceptional
$98,849
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Average
$100,523
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Tragic
$56,331
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Exceptional
22.7%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 82.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 82.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.9%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
17.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
16.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.7%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.4%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 32.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Tragic
29.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Tragic
82.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.1%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Exceptional
25.8%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 224.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 144.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 99.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 25.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 58.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 99.2%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
26.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
73.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
37.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
12.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
3.6%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 75.4%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
50.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Exceptional
42.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
17.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Excellent
2.0%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 34.3%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.56%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability
Disability MetricChineseImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%