Chinese vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,190,081 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 5.4 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $52,503, a difference of 13.9%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $68,208, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,400, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $116,830, a difference of 0.55%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $106,103, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $113,140, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.0%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.12, a difference of 7.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.96%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.1%).