Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,385,510 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.705. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.505% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 504.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $119,756, a difference of 31.4%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $125,540, a difference of 27.8%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $105,335, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $46,972, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 31.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 37.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 27.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 83.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.5%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 27.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).