Argentinean vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,455,579 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $119,756, a difference of 16.1%), median earnings ($50,399 compared to $56,638, a difference of 12.4%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $105,335, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $69,174, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $57,931, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.46%), male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.050%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 35.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.3%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.18%), ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 23.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.27%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.9%).