Chinese vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,184,062 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.422% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 422.3 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $52,081, a difference of 48.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $79,816, a difference of 45.5%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $67,879, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $47,704, a difference of 21.9%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $33,806, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 124.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 119.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 101.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 45.4%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 48.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 57.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 72.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 69.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.6%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 55.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.45, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 48.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.9%).