Chinese vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,802,307 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.211% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 210.8 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,645, a difference of 23.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,190, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $90,005, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,375, a difference of 0.21%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,389, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 63.4%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 42.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.1%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.42%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.5%).