Blackfeet vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,433,793 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 77.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $119,756, a difference of 46.9%), per capita income ($37,695 compared to $54,264, a difference of 44.0%), and median household income ($73,509 compared to $105,335, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $57,931, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $69,174, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 60.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.50%), and family households (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 105.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 93.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 70.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.7%).