Chinese vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,812,426 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 84.9 Yup'ik.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $30,518, a difference of 51.0%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $79,290, a difference of 46.5%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $39,504, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,732, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $32,730, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 267.2%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 234.5%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 188.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 31.8%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 64.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 67.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 261.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 236.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 234.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 101.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 112.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 115.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 173.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 93.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.3%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 458.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 72.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 60.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 98.1%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 94.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 8th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 296.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 74.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.5%).