Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Ethiopia
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,168
SOCIAL INDEX
69.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
129th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,768,995 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.250% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 249.7 Immigrants from Ethiopia.
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 20.1%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,238, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $102,763, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,924, a difference of 0.18%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,923, a difference of 0.38%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,434, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $45,923 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Excellent $106,969 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $88,687 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,924 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Good $55,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $42,744 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $53,408 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Average $95,256 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Good $102,763 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $65,238 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Good 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Fair 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Excellent 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.80%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 69.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 43.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 53.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 0.47%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Poor 92.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 68.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 62.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 50.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 42.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.6%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |