Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Chippewa
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,281,013 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 96.4 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,553 compared to $70,539, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.4%), and per capita income ($45,043 compared to $36,631, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,043 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,188 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,553 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,041 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,064 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,739 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,374 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,698 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,584 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,976 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 33.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 79.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.2% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households (62.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 62.7% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.7%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.59%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.7% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |