Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Chippewa

Good
Fair
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,281,013 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 96.4 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Chippewa Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,553 compared to $70,539, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.4%), and per capita income ($45,043 compared to $36,631, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Excellent
25.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 33.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 79.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.3%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households (62.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
42.6%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.7%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.59%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.9%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaChippewa
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%