Hawaiian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,581,242 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $53,847, a difference of 20.6%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $70,539, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $83,943, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.39%), median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $35,003, a difference of 7.1%), and per capita income ($39,403 compared to $36,631, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 38.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.8%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 28.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.20, a difference of 6.5%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.1%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.19%), ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and associate's degree (40.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%).